Seven take -away restaurants of Ukraine Minerals Deal

The US and Ukraine have signed a deal that gives Washington access to some of the natural resources of the country torn by war.

For months, it draws up an investment fund that Ukraine hopes will confirm American help because the country is struggling to ward off Russia three years after the invasion.

The Ukrainians have now published the deal And there have been public statements from both sides. Here are seven important take -away restaurants.

Trump has previously demanded that Ukraine will repay the $ 350 billion (£ 264 billion) of assistance that he claims that the US was provided during the war – a condition that Zensky has rejected.

But Washington seems to have made a concession. The Ukrainian Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal said that the agreement did not dictate that his country repels an assumed “debts”.

Trump has also stylized the agreement as a victory before his side and says that his country will “much more in theory” come back than the billions provided to Ukraine by his predecessor Joe Biden.

The language used by the US in announcing the deal is particularly stricter towards Russia than is usually the case of the Trump government.

The agreement refers to “the full invasion of Russia” and the US Department of Finance adds that “no state or person who has financed or delivered the Russian war machine may benefit from the reconstruction of Ukraine”.

This will man Kyiv, which has put more pressure on Russia in conversations between Moscow and Washington who stops a possible -discussing the fires.

Despite the fact that much of the conversation around the deal relates to the mineral wealth of Ukraine, the agreement also includes provisions for oil, natural gas and other hydrocarbons.

In all cases, the means remain in Ukrainian property, although the US has joint access.

The absorption of oil and gas was seen as a softening of the Ukrainian position because they were not in earlier designs of the deal.

Ukraine has long been to become a member of the European Union and access talks that have formally started in June.

There were some worries in Kiev that the means agreement could hinder Ukraine’s assets to become a member of the EU if it gave preferential treatment to American investors, because KYIV and Brussels already have a strategic partnership for raw materials.

But the text of the deal says that the US acknowledges the intention of Ukraine to become a member of the EU and the need for this agreement not to conflict with it.

It also says that if Ukraine has to visit the conditions of the deal again due to “additional obligations” as part of joining the EU, the US agrees to negotiate in good faith.

Moreover, KYIV says that the US will support additional transfers of investments and technology in Ukraine, including from the EU and elsewhere.

The US has framed the deal as essential to sign if Ukraine must continue to receive its military aid.

Ukrainian first Deputy Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko – who flew to Washington DC to sign the deal – said it had the US in mind that kept new help in the future, such as air defense systems.

This too would mark a change in strategy for Trump – who tried to relax military support for Ukraine since they returned to the White House.

An excellent question is what the agreement will ultimately mean for the state of the war. The Kremlin has not yet responded to the agreement.

It seems that there are no concrete security guarantees of the US, something that Ukraine and Europe have long been pushing the White House to offer.

Trump has long been cautious to give the same military commitment that Biden had given.

Instead, his interest in keeping the course with American support for Ukraine is more implicit, because of the economic obligations set out in this deal.

That means that there would still be a vulnerability about the dedication of the most important ally of Ukraine.

An intriguing point that is emphasized by the Government of Ukraine is that for the first decade of the Reconstruction Investment Fund, the profit “is completely re -invested in the economy of Ukraine”, either in new projects or reconstruction.

This can be potentially important if there is no financial benefit for the US for 10 years.

However, this provision does not seem to be in the Washington agreement, although it can later be part of an extra “technical” deal.

After that first 10 -year period, KYIV says that profit can be distributed between the partners.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox News late Wednesday on Wednesday that the deal was a signal for the American people that “we have the chance to participate, part of the financing and weapons, compensation for them and partners with the success of the Ukrainian population”.