Top Primatologist explains why 100 men versus 1 gorilla fight would not happen

A top primatologist tries to bring a reason in the hundred men versus one gorilla debate … Explaining the main reason why a fight like this would not fall – and argues with these beautiful creatures in a poor light.

We spoke with Michael Stern – The former curator of primates in the Philadelphia Zoo with years of experience with studying gorillas, both in captivity and in the wild in Uganda and he tells us the most important reason why this debate is so stupid, is because a gorilla is looking around, see it in the minority and starts.

Stern says that this is equivalent to ask if a unicorn can bring down a dinosaur – or whether a shark with a laser beam can blow up a submarine!

The gorilla would realize that it was in a bad place and probably sprinted through the nearest line of men … Save one or two while you are trying to run – no war for the planet of the monkeys here. Sorry, Chris Pontius – It seems that you are wrong this.

Michael explains that the reason people are so of this debate is because of the pure speed and power of gorillas – and he admits that they are super strong creatures … but they are more soft giants than fierce soldiers, and all this conversation is really harmful to their representative.

For a primacy that may cause some damage to a group of men, Michael says, look no further than the chimpanzee … of which some people have attacked in the past.

Michael also spoke to us about the New Nature Foundation – An organization that is part of, wants to stop deforestation in Africa through various new technologies- in the event that People actually want to help primates instead of arguing about their fighting insight. Listen to and view their website for more info.