Ange postcoglou says his reaction to Booing Tottenham fans during their defeat 1-0 to Chelsea was incorrectly interpreted.
Spurs fans sang “you don’t know what you are doing” at their boss under the fire when Lucas Bergvall was replaced by Pope Sarr just in an hour with their team, which withdrew and still had to register a shot at the target.
When Sarr scored only five minutes later, the postcoglou turned to the Spurs fans, and seemed that some of what some perceived in response to BOOS. The goal was expelled after the lengthy check.
But the postcogla was confused by this proposal and insisted that he just wanted the fans to enjoy the moment, and sensed that if the goal calculated the driving power of the game, he would turn for his team.
Use the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Ange postcoglou said he was raging the game and denied the fans of Tottenham Hotspur Away when Booed was for bringing Pope Matar Sarr
Asked about the incident, the chief of Spurs said, “It is incredible how things are interpreted. We just scored, I just wanted to hear them cheer up.
“We were in a difficult time and I thought it was a cracking goal. I wanted them to be really excited.
“I felt at the moment we could go on and win the game. I just felt that momentum was (going) our way.
“It doesn’t bother me. It’s not the first time that my substitution or my decision emerged. That’s okay, it’s allowed, but we just scored a goal, we’ve just scored an equalizer.”
Asked if he risked fans’ alienation by having this answer, he added, “You know what? I’m today in such a disconnection with the world who knows who knows, maybe you’re right. But that’s not my intention.”
Use the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
FREE FREE: The most important points from the Premier League match between Chelsea and Tottenham Hotspur
The postcogla, who is a loud critic of Var, was frantic with a long time referee Craig Pawson spent Mulling over whether Sar’s goal was.
The clerk in the field was sent to his monitor after Sarr joined with the foot Moises Caicedo in moments just before his strike for what the Spurs equalizer would be.
It took himself to decide that he decided that the goal should be inverted, which questioned the postcogla, whether it was a clear and obvious mistake.
“Who cares if it’s a foul or not? There are so many incidents that are very similar there,” Postecoglou said.
“What is the point of having? Clear and obvious for me that you are going to the screen, you see it,” Oh my God, I missed it “.
“I think we are all – no me, because I’m very loud about it – but everyone accepts it.
“We can also go with players at some point. Some guy comes with a brilliant way to have only a football game without participants, because the judges are not referees.”
“If someone believes that when the boil was brought, we would sit for six minutes with a microscope, it is irrelevant whether it is a mistake or not. It’s absolutely irrelevant.”
Use the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Dermot Gallagher discusses why James Tarkowski was to see red for his challenge on Alexis Mac Allister
Postoocglou suggested that when deciding to decide on a shortage because he seemingly referred to the decision not to make James Tarkowski James Tarkowski’s red card in Merseyside Derby.
He added, “Jared Gillett was to boil tonight. Maybe if Jared Gillett was in boiling yesterday, it would be another result, because again it will come down, I think for every interpretation. But I don’t like it, buddy. I never liked it.”
