Everton’s controversial punishment against Arsenal was rather a foul outside the box, says Dermot Gallagher at Ref Watch | Football news


Dermot Gallagher says that Everton was lucky to be punished in his draw with Arsenal, while the former Premier League referee will also throw other controversial calls this weekend.

Everton 1-1 Arsenal

“Foul is going on in front of the box”

Use the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The Watch Ref Watch panel discussed the Challenge of Myles Lewis-Sklly on Jack Harrison, who resulted in the fact that the defender of Arsenal admitted a punishment during their 1-1 draw with Everton.

INCIDENT: Darren England gave Everton a penalty at Goodison Park for what looked like Myles Lewis-Sklly on Jack Harrison. Vary agreed with the referee.

Dermot says: “I think if you make an attack on ahead in this case, there will be more foul outside the area. Then let him go. I don’t think it’s punishment.

“The reaction of the player is key. But he will never turn over when he is given on the pitch.”

Use the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The most important of the Premier League match between Everton and Arsenal.

Sue Smith says: “I think it’s soft. But Lewis-Sklly will fall on him inside the area. I think it will never be inverted. You can see why the judge gave it.

Stephen Warnock says: “I’m still 50/50. I understand why it’s given because it’s clumsy. But if it’s not given, I understand it because there is little contact. It would be a foul anywhere else on the pitch? I think it would be.”

Use the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Ref Watch will look closer at the foul Ruben Dias at Alejandro Garnacho, just 45 seconds to the Manchester derby, and asks: Was John Brooks the right to make?

Crystal Palace 2-1 Brighton

“Referees under reservation rights”

INCIDENT: The replacement of Crystal Palace Eddie NKETIAH lasted less than 10 minutes on the pitch in the failure of the park after the collection of two yellow cards.

Use the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Ref Watch looks at two yellow Crystal Palace cards Eddie NKETIAH and asks: Was it unlucky that he was initially booked for diving?

He wanted a punishment in the second half, but instead he was booked for diving.

Dermot says: “I think the judge is to give yellow in his rights. If there is minimal contact, he tries to deceive the referee? Anthony Taylor felt yes. Because of what happens, this problem suddenly increases.”

Stephen Warnock says: “NKETIAH realizes that he’s probably not getting there, anticipating contact and then going down. It’s probably more dive.”

Sue Smith: “It’s a rough yellow card.”

“Deserved second yellow”

INCIDENT: NKETIAH is then depicted by the second yellow for a high shoe on Jan Paul van Hecke and is released.

Dermot says: “He says he is unlucky because he watches the ball and does not see Van Hecke, but once you raise your leg like this, it will be a yellow card for a ruthless game.”

Use the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The most important of the Premier League match between Crystal Palace and Brighton.

Sue Smith: “I feel for him because he just watches the ball. But when your leg is raised so high and connects with the player, you will always bird. This is the second yellow.”

Fulham 3-2 Liverpool

Should Fulham get a punishment?

In Craven Cottage Super Sunday, Fulham wanted a punishment for this incident because goalkeeper Caoimhin Kelleher pulled out Andreas Pereira after playing the ball …

Use the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The Watch Ref Watch panel discusses the four main incidents from Fulham’s victory 3-2 over Liverpool and emphasizes the controversial stopping goalkeeper Liverpool Caoimhin Kelleher in the box.

Dermot says: “The judges felt as if both players were colliding. You know my theory of the goalkeeper is coming out like this, I always say if the breeder goes with his feet, becomes an outfield player. I think it’s a foul and should be punished.”

Stephen Warnock says: “I immediately thought it was a punishment. Kelleher tried to read the direction of the ball but pulled out the players out. It’s clumsy.”

Use the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Premier League draws attention to the match between Fulham and Liverpool.

“No Error in Guidance to Equalizer Sessegnon”

INCIDENT: Liverpool defender Ibrahmia Konate referred to him Rodrigo Muniz to the foul in the accumulation of Fulham’s equalizer.

Use the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sessegnon strikes back to indicate Fulham Level

Dermot says: “Not for me. Players will knock down. It’s a contact game. Play as the judge did it, and no reason to keep the game.”

Stephen Warnock says: “Nowhere close enough to give a foul. It was just a hard day in the office for Honate. He lost the flight of the balls.”

Tottenham 3-1 Southampton

“Semi -automated offsides should shorten waiting time”

INCIDENT: Tottenham thought they had a second goal when Lucas Bergvvall put the ball into the net, only for Var, Cristian Romero was offside.

The check took four minutes of 50 seconds.

Dermot says: “We had a lot of extended offside checks at the weekend. It will be different next Saturday because the semi -automated semi -automatic will come and invent most of it.”

Use the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Premier League draws attention to the match between Tottenham Hotspur and Southampton.

Is it a debate decision for too long?

Stephen Warnock says: “Fans now get lost that Var is going through decisions with a soft tooth. It must be faster. It destroys the atmosphere in the land and kills the pace of games. This is a difficult thing.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *