BBC News

A Controversial Bill Seeker Pounding New Zealand’s Founding Document, What Established The Rights of Both Māori and non-Māori in the country, has been defeated at Its Second Reading.
The Treaty Principles Bill Was Voted Down 112 Votes To 11, Days After a Government Committee Recommended That Should Not Proceeded.
The Proposed Legislation Sought To The Principles Of The 1840 Treaty Of Waitangi – Causing Widespread Outrage That Saw More than 40,000 People Taking Part In A Protest Outside Parliament Last Year.
The Bill Had Already Been Widely Expected To Fail, With Most Major Political Parties Committed to Voting It Down.
Members of the Right-Wing Act Party, which tabled it, were the Only MPS to Vote for Thursday on The Second Reading. Act’s Leader David Seymour has been promised to Continue on the Campaigning on the Issue.
“I Believe Ther Bill or Something Like One Day Because There Are Not Good Arguments Against Its Contents,” He wrote on social media.
In November, Tensions Were High Parliament During A Debate Ahead of the Vote. Labor Mp Willie Jackson Was Told to Leave After Refusing To Withdraw a Calling Seymour A “Liar”.
Labor Leader Chris Hipkins Said The Proposed Legislation Would the “Be easily Evil-Clarke easily easily East Mip-Clans – WHO Gainered International Attention Starting a Haka in Parliament at The Bill’s First Reading – Said It Had been “Annihilated”.
“Instead of dividing and Conquering, this BACK BACKFIRED AND United Communities Across the Motu of Our Founding Agreement and What It Party Co-Leader Marama Davidson Later Said in A Statement.
The Second Reading Came A SELECT KOMMITTEE, Looking at the Proposed Legislation Released ITS Final Report – Revealing That More Than 300,000 Submissions Had Been Made, The Vast Majority Of Wower Opposed.
It is the Largest Response to the proposed legislation that The New Zealand Parliament has recived Ever Receed.

While The Principles of The Treaty Have Never Be Defined in Law, ITS CORE VALUES Have, Over Time, Been Woven Into Legislation An Effort to Offer Redress to Māori For The Wrong During Them During Colonison.
Act’s Proposed Legislation Had Three Main Principles: That The New Zealand Government has the Power to Govern, and parliament to Make Laws; That The Crown Would Rights of Māori At The Time The Treaty Was Signed; And That Everyone Is Equal Before and Entitled to Equal Protection.
The Party Said The Bill Would The Treaty Itself Butself But Would “Continue The Process Defining The Treaty Principles.” This, They Believe, Would Help To Create Equality All New Zealanders and Improve Social Cohesion.
Among Those Backing It was Ruth Richardson, A Finter Finance Minister The Center-Right National Party, Who Told The Select Committee Was The Proposed Legislation Was Whose Time Has Come. ”
She Argued That The Treaty Itself Could Not Be Disputed, The Idea of Itea Principles Was, Andese Moder “, Andese Principles Had So Far Been Larged by The Courts, Rather Than Parliament.
“There is a New Zealand on The Cultural Front, The Necessity to Address and Correct Treaty Overreach That has increasingly and Evidently Become Wayward and Wrong,” She Said.

Opponents of the Bill, Meanwhile, Believe It Would Be Detrimental to Māori and Create Greater Social Divides.
Sharon Hawke, The Late Native Māori ACTIVIS AND MP Joe Hawke, Spoke to the PEOPLE’S ABROGING TO ABIILITY, Gain Wall Housing, Gain Health Housing, Gain Health Housing, Gain Health Housing, Gain Health Housing, Gain Health Housing, Gain Health Housing, Gain Health Housing, Gain Health Housing, Gain Health Housing, Gain Health. “
She added that the Bill “polluted” The idea of All New Zealanders Having a Future Together.
“We’ll Continue to show our opposition to this,” She Said.
Key Idesues Of Members of the Public Submissions Who Made Submissions With It Was Of The Values Of The Treaty, And That It Had Promoted Equality – Not Taking Into Social Disparities, Such As Those Of The Legacy colonization.
There were the conserns about the extent to the Bill Complied with International Law, and Whether It Would I Negatively Impact New Zealand’s Reputation Internationally.
Submitters Who Supported The Bill, Meanwhile, Referred to Current Lack Clarity and Certainty About The Principles of the Treaty, and of the Importance of Equality All.
They are also important to hold a backyendum to Hold a National Conversation Around The Treaty – Something David Seymour Believes Is Still Needed.
The Treaty Principles Bill Passed Its First Reading, With Support National – The Dominant Party in New Zealand’s Ruling Coalition – Who Had Promised to AS Part Of A Coalition Agreement, But No Any Further.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, Who is Also Leader of the National Party, Previously Said There Was That Bill That He Liked. He was not in Parliament for ITS SECOND Reading, But Remarked Earlier in The Day That It Was Time From Move.