Sudan Accuses at the UAE of ‘Complicity in Genocide’ at ICJ

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) Is Hearing A Case Brought by Accusing the United Arab Emirates of Being “Complicit in the Genocide” During The Current Civil War.

The Two-Year Conflict, What has pitted Sudan’s Army’s Army’s Armain Support Forces (RSF), Has LED to Thousand Thousands of Deaths and Forced More Than 12 Million From Their Homes.

Sudan Alleges That The UAE has been the RSF with the AIM Of the Wip Of The Where-Arab Masalit Population Of West Darfur. The UAE has Said the case is a Cynical Publicity Stunt and is Seeking An Immediate dismissal.

Since the War began, Both The RSF and The Sudanese Army Have ACCUSED OF COMMITTING ATROCITIES.

According to Sudan’s Case, The RSF has carried out on the attacks on Systematic Attacks, Especially The Masalit Community, With The Intent to Destroy Them AS A Distinct Ethnic Group.

Among Other Things, It Also Alleges That The RSF has Used Rape As A Weapon Against Civilians.

At The Beginning of this year The US Also Accused The Committing Genocide and Imposed Sanctions on IT Leader Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, Also Known As Hemedti.

Gen Hememedti has previously Denied ITS Fighters Have Deliberately Targeted Civilians.

As the ICJ Deals Disputes Between States, Sudan’s Military Government Cannot Take The RSF to The Court.

Instead It has been brought to the Case Against One of IT IT ALLEXED sponsors.

Sudan Argues That Those Atrocities were enabled by Extensive Financial, Military and Political Support from The UAE, Including Arms Shipments, Drone Training and The Recruitment of Mercenaries.

It says this means The UAE IS complicit in Genocide.

Sudan Is Seeking Reparaks and Urgent Measures to Prevent Further Genocidal Acts.

The UAE has strongly rejected the allegations, dentying That it is an arming The RSF, and Said It Would An Immediate Immediate dismissal.

“The ICJ IS NOT A STAGO POLITICAL THEATRICS, AND IT MUST BE WAPONISED FOR DISINFORNISED,” The UAE Said Statement.

“This is nothing more than a cynical pr stunt … Antempt to deflect the UP Well-docented atrocities Against The Sudanese People and IT Refusal to Cease Fire or Engage in genuine negotiations.”

In Court on Thursday, Sudan’s Legal Team That there was a plausible harm to the Masalit People and There was an urgent Need for the ICJ to Intervene No Further Genocidal Acts are even committed.

Sudan has been requested to the judges to rule that the UAE should be blocked from Supplying the RSF. And the UAE Should Report Back to The Court How These Measures Even Being Implemented.

The UAE is expected to Argu That The Case Should Be Thrown Out.

Most Legal Experts Appear to the Case of the Case Has Little Chance Of Going Beyond This Point.

The UAE has a reservation – or opt out – to the Genocide Convention What has Meant in Previous Cases, The ICJ Does Not Have JurisDiction Over These Types of Claims.

However, in Bringing ITS GRIEVANCES to the UN’s top court, Sudan has drawn attention to what it is to conflict the uae’s role.

In Terms Of What Happens Within A Matter Of The Judges Decide They Have The Power to Act On The Power To Request Them To The Injunction – Provisional Measures for The UAE to Prevent Act Acts Genocide.

ICJ Rulings Are Legally Binding, But The Court Itself has no Direct Powers to Enforce ITS Decisions.